Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes

On 2018-05-11 14:56:12 +0200, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 11 May 2018 at 05:32, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > No. Simon just claimed it's not actually a concern:
> > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CANP8+j+vtskPhEp_GmqmEqdWaKSt2KbOtee0yz-my+Agh0aRPw@mail.gmail.com
> >
> > And yes, it got committed without doing squat to address the
> > architectural concerns.
> 
> "Squat" means "zero, nothing" to me. So that comment would be inaccurate.

Yes, I know it means that. And I don't see how it is inaccurate.


> I have no problem if you want to replace this with an even better
> design in a later release.

Meh. The author / committer should get a patch into the right shape, not
other people that are concerned with the consequences.

Greetings,

Andres Freund