Re: [BUG] Re-entering malloc problem when use --enable-nls buildpostgresql
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUG] Re-entering malloc problem when use --enable-nls buildpostgresql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20180508195157.etrkobpoon6bxmu6@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUG] Re-entering malloc problem when use --enable-nls buildpostgresql (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BUG] Re-entering malloc problem when use --enable-nls build postgresql
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 2018-05-08 01:36:31 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2018-05-08 02:07:08 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > > > On 2018-05-08 01:32:33 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > >> There are not any better alternatives. We can't just set a flag in the > > >> signal handler and hope that control will someday reach a place that > > >> notices the flag. We could exit without attempting to report anything, > > >> but nobody would find that user-friendly. So we try to report, in the > > >> full understanding that sometimes it won't work. > > > > > It'd be fairly unproblematic to write an untranslated message out. > > > > To stderr, maybe. Across an SSL-encrypted client connection? You're > > dreaming. > > libpq invents an equivalent message when the server closes the > connection anyway, IIRC. So that'd not necessarily be too bad. Oh, also: It looks like it'd actually be relatively easy to give openssl its own memory allocator + pool: Create a global 'openssl' memory context with preallocation, use CRYPTO_set_mem_functions() to make openssl allocations go through small wrapper functions around palloc/repalloc/pfree. It's still not entirely kosher to call into openssl from a signal handler because we could be inside openssl - but the window for that is a lot smaller than being inside *any* memory allocation. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: