Re: perlcritic and perltidy
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: perlcritic and perltidy |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20180508121147.GJ27724@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: perlcritic and perltidy (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: perlcritic and perltidy
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Greetings, * Michael Paquier (michael@paquier.xyz) wrote: > On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 09:14:06PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > > While I appreciate the support, I'm not sure that you're actually > > agreeing with me.. I was arguing that braces should be on their own > > line and therefore there would be a new line for the brace. > > Specifically, when moving lines between hashes, it's annoying to have to > > also worry about if the line being copied/moved has braces at the end or > > not- much easier if they don't and the braces are on their own line. > > I should have read that twice. Yes we are not on the same line. Even > if a brace is on a different line, per your argument it would still be > nicer to add a comma at the end of each last element of a hash or an > array, which is what you have done in the tests of pg_dump, but not > something that the proposed patch does consistently. If the formatting > is automated, the way chosen does not matter much, but the extra last > comma should be consistently present as well? Yes, that would be nice as well, as you'd be able to move entries around more easily that way. Thanks! Stephen
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: