Re: ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE for partitioned tables
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE for partitioned tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20180419194017.xeqvcndqsslojqk2@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE for partitioned tables (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE for partitioned tables
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Amit Langote wrote: > > > Yeah, I too have wondered in the past what it would take to make > > equalTupDescs() return true for parent and partitions. Maybe we can make > > it work by looking a bit harder than I did then. > > How about simply relaxing the tdtypeid test from equalTupleDescs? I > haven't looked deeply but I think just checking whether or not both are > RECORDOID might be sufficient, for typecache purposes. After looking at the code, I'm a bit nervous about doing this, because I don't fully understand what is going on in typcache, and what is the HeapTupleHeaderGetTypeId macro really doing. I'm afraid that if we confuse a table's tupdesc with one of its partition's , something entirely random might end up happening. Maybe this is completely off-base, but if so I'd like to have to proof. So I'm thinking of reverting that patch instead per your patch. While composing this we got emails from Robert and Peter G suggesting the same too, so consider it done. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: