Re: PgUpgrade bumped my XIDs by ~50M?

On Wed, Apr  4, 2018 at 07:13:36PM -0500, Jerry Sievers wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Is it possible that pg_upgrade used 50M xids while upgrading?
> 
> Hi Bruce.
> 
> Don't think so, as I did just snap the safety snap and ran another
> upgrade on that.
> 
> And I also compared txid_current for the upgraded snap and our running
> production instance.
> 
> The freshly upgraded snap is ~50M txids behind the prod instance.

Are the objects 50M behind or is txid_current 50M different?  Higher or
lower?


> 
> If this is a not too uncommon case of users running amok, then this time
> in particular they really went off the charts :-)

I have never heard of this problem.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +