Re: "IS NOT DOCUMENT" is missing
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: "IS NOT DOCUMENT" is missing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20180402204159.GA30362@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: "IS NOT DOCUMENT" is missing (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-docs |
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 11:51:50AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 3/30/18 10:40, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 01:56:32AM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote: > >> 2018-03-09 0:10 GMT-03:00 PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>: > >>> From testing, it seems like PostgreSQL supports the syntax "IS NOT DOCUMENT" > >>> in addition to "IS DOCUMENT", similar to "IS NOT NULL", "IS NOT FALSE", etc, > >>> however this does not appear to be documented, only "IS DOCUMENT" is. > >>> > >> It has been like that since day 1. I'm not sure why it was not > >> documented. It already has some tests. I'll bet that was an oversight. > >> Should we repeat the statement in another item (like the attached > >> patch)? Another option is to add a statement in the "IS DOCUMENT" > >> item. I'm afraid that NULL return wouldn't be clear. > >> > > > > Patch applied and backpatched to Postgres 10. Thank.s > > Per the nearby discussion, this should probably also be backpatched further. OK, backpatched through 9.3. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: