Re: pgsql: Fix CommandCounterIncrement in partition-related DDL
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Fix CommandCounterIncrement in partition-related DDL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20180320182659.nyzn3vqtjbbtfgwq@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Fix CommandCounterIncrement in partition-related DDL
Re: pgsql: Fix CommandCounterIncrement in partition-related DDL |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Fix CommandCounterIncrement in partition-related DDL > > Hmm, Prion seems unhappy about this. Looking Here's a patch that seems to fix the problem, and generally looks sane to me. The previous arrangements to avoid CCI seem brittle: apparently we were forced to do StorePartitionBounds() and immediately update_default_partition_oid() without CCI in between, or various things went nuts ("unexpected partdefid"). With this patch, what we do is we call update_default_partition_oid *within* StorePartitionBounds without an intervening CCI, which seems to achieve the same result -- namely that when the relcache entry is rebuilt, it doesn't end up incomplete. The two places that previously called update_default_partition_oid with a non-zero default partition OID no longer call it, since they were storing bounds. The only places that remain outside of StorePartitionBounds call it with InvalidOid (during relation drop, and during partition detach). I also remove a crock in RelationBuildPartitionDesc to return empty when "key is null" (i.e. pg_class entry was there but not pg_partitioned_table), which makes no sense -- except if you're building the cache untimely, which apparently is what was happening. If you make sure the pg_partitioned_table entry is present before making the pg_class entry visible, then this should not be necessary. heap_drop_with_catalog contains a copy-paste failure, fixed also in this patch. I wonder about adding a syscache callback so that when an item in pg_partitioned_table is invalidated, the relcache entry for partrelid entry in pg_class is invalidated also. I can't find any precedent for anything similar, though, and there doesn't seem to be any convenient place to do it, either. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: