Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20180307173719.jxj7ybekicjk2j4k@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Protect syscache from bloating with negative cache entries
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2018-03-07 08:01:38 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > I wonder if this is just because we refuse to acknowledge the notion of > a connection pooler. If we did, and the pooler told us "here, this > session is being given back to us by the application, we'll keep it > around until the next app comes along", could we clean the oldest > inactive cache entries at that point? Currently they use DISCARD for > that. Though this does nothing to fix hypothetical cache bloat for > pg_dump in bug #14936. I'm not seeing how this solves anything? You don't want to throw all caches away, therefore you need a target size. Then there's also the case of the cache being too large in a single "session". Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: