Re: pg_get_functiondef forgets about most GUC_LIST_INPUT GUCs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: pg_get_functiondef forgets about most GUC_LIST_INPUT GUCs
Дата
Msg-id 20180306013200.GG1878@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_get_functiondef forgets about most GUC_LIST_INPUT GUCs  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: pg_get_functiondef forgets about most GUC_LIST_INPUT GUCs  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 09:25:09PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> I afraid so there is not good solution. Is possible to store options in
> original form? When the function will be displayed, then the original value
> will be displayed. The current patch (with known extensions) can be used as
> bug fix and back patched. In new version we store original value with
> quotes.

You mean storing the values in pg_proc.proconfig at the creation time of
the function?  That would basically work, except for the case of a
function using a parameter which is not from the same PL.  The function
creation would fail because it cannot find the parameter it is looking
for as we need to look at loaded parameters to know it uses a list or
not :(
--
Michael

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Change RangeVarGetRelidExtended() to take flags argument?
Следующее
От: Thomas Munro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 2018-03 CFM