Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for largerconnection counts
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for largerconnection counts |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20180304001409.tajjmefj7yq6xs77@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for largerconnection counts (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>) |
Ответы |
Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for largerconnection counts
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-03-01 11:30:39 +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote: > > > > -#ifdef HAVE_SYS_SELECT_H > > > +#ifdef PGBENCH_USE_SELECT /* force use of select(2)? */ > > > +#undef HAVE_PPOLL > > > +#endif > > > +#ifdef HAVE_PPOLL > > > +#include <poll.h> > > > +#elif defined(HAVE_SYS_SELECT_H) > > > +#define POLL_USING_SELECT > > > > (random thing noticed while going through patches) > > > > It strikes me as a bad idea to undefine configure selected > > symbols. Postgres header might rely on them. It also strikes me as > > entirely unnecessary here. > > Yes, I though about this one but let it pass. Indeed, it would be sufficient > to not load "poll.h" when select is forced, without undefining the configure > setting. I've marked the CF entry waiting on author. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: