Re: [PoC PATCH] Parallel dump to /dev/null
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PoC PATCH] Parallel dump to /dev/null |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20180301180406.amwvgmfqy7ithqgi@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PoC PATCH] Parallel dump to /dev/null (Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-03-01 14:21:24 +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > Hi, > > Am Donnerstag, den 01.03.2018, 01:28 -0800 schrieb Andres Freund: > > Hi, > > > > On 2018-02-28 14:28:41 +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > > > I have added this patch to the next commitfest: > > > > > > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/17/1576/ > > > > Given this is a new patch, submitted for the last commitfest, and not > > completely trivial, I'd argue this is too late for v11. > > I was under the impression that rule was rather about complicated and > invasive patches, not just any patch which isn't completely trivial. I think you're right this patch is a bit boderline for that. But we have ~220 pending CF entries, and fairly limited review and commit capacity. Something's gotta give. A lot of those are patches that have been waiting to be committed for a while. So things added first to the last CF the day before it starts are prime candidates. You probably can increase your chances by herding a few patches towards being committable. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: