Re: BUG #15025: PSQL CLI - inconsistency when both -d and -Usupplies a username
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #15025: PSQL CLI - inconsistency when both -d and -Usupplies a username |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20180128203633.GC4380@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #15025: PSQL CLI - inconsistency when both -d and -U supplies a username (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #15025: PSQL CLI - inconsistency when both -d and -U supplies a username
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 03:30:54PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 02:38:46PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Isn't it possible to get the URI parse > >> results back out of libpq? > > > Well, there is PQuser(), but you need to pass a connection struct to > > that, and before you connect you don't have one. > > Yeah, but we normally don't prompt for password till after a failed > connection attempt, at which point we can get the info. So I propose > something like the attached. > > There's room for debate about what we ought to do when -W (--password) is > specified, but I think that that's not really that exciting because the > only real use-cases for it are noninteractive applications that aren't > going to care what the prompt is. So in the startup.c case I have it > just offering the neutral "Password: " prompt always. In the \c case, > I left it using the same initial username as it was before, because the > odds that that's right seem considerably higher with \c. You can still > fool it by giving a URI dbname to \c, so maybe there's an argument for > lobotomizing the initial prompt in \c too, but I didn't do that here. Oh, I wasn't aware a failed login left us with a 'conn'. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: