Re: reducing isolation tests runtime

Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> > Here's a concrete proposal.  Runtime is 45.7 seconds on my laptop.  It
> > can be further reduced, but not by more than a second or two unless you
> > get in the business of modifying other tests.  (I only modified
> > deadlock-soft-2 because it saves 5 seconds).
> 
> Looks reasonable to me, but do we want to set any particular convention
> about the max number of tests to run in parallel?  If so there should
> be at least a comment saying what.

Hmm, I ran this in a limited number of connections and found that it
fails with less than 27; and there's no MAX_CONNECTIONS like there is
for pg_regress.  So I'll put this back on the drawing board until I'm
back from vacations ...

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services