Re: documentation is now XML

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 03:39:24PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Also, we're way overdue for getting out from under the creaky TeX-based
> toolchain for producing PDFs.  Every time we make releases, I worry
> whether we're going to get blindsided by its bugs with hotlinks that get
> split across pages, since page breaks tend to vary in position depending
> on exactly whose version of the toolchain and style sheets you build with.
> I've also been living in fear of the day we hit some hardwired TeX limit
> that we can't increase or work around.  We've had to hack around such
> limits repeatedly in the past (eg commit 944b41fc0).  Now, it's probably
> unlikely that growth of the release notes would be enough to put us over
> the top in any back branch --- but if it did happen, we'd find out about
> it at a point in the release cycle where there's very little margin for
> error.

I am coming in late here, but I am not aware of any open source
professional typesetting software that has output quality as good as
TeX.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +