Re: Missing wal_receiver_status_interval in Subscribers section
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Missing wal_receiver_status_interval in Subscribers section |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20180124003438.GC26207@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Missing wal_receiver_status_interval in Subscribers section (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Missing wal_receiver_status_interval in Subscribers section
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:36:04PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Can someone confirm this so I can apply this patch? Never mind. I see this was applied: doc: mention wal_receiver_status_interval as GUC affecting logical rep worker. wal_receiver_timeout, wal_receiver_status_interval and wal_retrieve_retry_interval configuration parameters affect the logical rep worker, but previously only wal_receiver_status_interval was not mentioned as such parameter in the doc. Back-patch to v10 where logical rep was added. Author: Masahiko Sawada Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAD21AoBUnuH_UsnKXyPCsCR7EAMamW0sSb6a7=WgiQRpnMAp5w@mail.gmail.com -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: