Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [SenderAddress Forgery]Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [SenderAddress Forgery]Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Дата
Msg-id 20180118194100.dy3kxdtktsbvm4eq@alap3.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [SenderAddress Forgery]Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re:[Sender Address Forgery]Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Hi Amit,

It seems your mail system continually adds "[Sender Address Forgery]"
prefixes to messages. E.g. this mail now has
Subject: Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [HACKERS] path toward
fasterpartition pruning
 
as its subject, whereas the mail you're replying to only had
Subject: Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
two of them.

I think the two previous occurances of this also are from you.

This is somewhat annoying, could you try to figure out a) what the
problem is b) how to prevent the subject being edited like that?

Regards,

Andres

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least9.5)?