Re: polymorphic parameters limits - correct solution?
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: polymorphic parameters limits - correct solution? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20180116022144.6tw6cy26l5ddbhqv@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | polymorphic parameters limits - correct solution? (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: polymorphic parameters limits - correct solution?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule wrote: > Hi > > I played with introduction of new pair of Polymorphic Parameters - like > anyXelement and anyXarray. Now, I don't think so enhancing PP is good way > now. Without significant redesign there are not practical append more code > there. > > Why this is a issue? The extension's authors are not able to specify result > type without enumeration of all possible function signatures. Similar > situation is in argument processing - there are workaround based on "any" > type. I cannot offer any advice for your "helper" (because I don't really understand what the helper does), but I am reminded of this old thread: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20090908161210.GD549%40alvh.no-ip.org ... in which datatype "any" was one of the offered tools, and also from whence the format() function sprung. Nice ... -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: