Re: pgsql: pg_upgrade: simplify code layout in a few places
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: pg_upgrade: simplify code layout in a few places |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20180105193212.dnnz5asze64lgrfj@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: pg_upgrade: simplify code layout in a few places (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: pg_upgrade: simplify code layout in a few places
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 02:20:59PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > > pg_upgrade: simplify code layout in a few places > > > > > > Backpatch-through: 9.4 (9.3 didn't need improving) > > > > Hmm. We don't normally do things like this, because it breaks translatability. > > Oh, you mean the 'if()' statement? If so, I will revert that and add a > comment so I don't do it again in that place. See 837255cc81fb59b12f5a70ac2a8a9850bccf13e0. I don't think adding comments to every single place where this could be done (which is many places, not just in pg_upgrade) is a good idea. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: