Re: pgsql: Fix deadlock hazard in CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY

Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:

> > Actually, so far only 9.6 and up have failed.  Maybe the old
> > isolationtester is different enough that the other thing doesn't happen.
> 
> > I'm more inclined now to add the alternate file instead of the other
> > patch.
> 
> Meh.  I'd rather have the more stable test going forward; I think
> alternate expected-files too easily hide unexpected behavior.  We could
> try leaving 9.4/9.5 alone and see if it's true that it doesn't fail
> there.  If not, I wouldn't mind losing the test in those branches
> --- it's mainly intended to catch future breakage, after all.

Makes sense.  Pushed to 9.6 and up.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services