Re: roundoff problem in time datatype
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: roundoff problem in time datatype |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2017792B-EB5B-4275-B771-4AF35599976B@fastcrypt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: roundoff problem in time datatype (Dennis Bjorklund <db@zigo.dhs.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: roundoff problem in time datatype
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Actually, I think there is a case where 24:00 is a proper time. Isn't it used for adding leap seconds ? Dave On 26-Sep-05, at 3:39 AM, Dennis Bjorklund wrote: > On Sun, 25 Sep 2005, Tom Lane wrote: > > >> Alternatively: why are we forbidding the value 24:00:00 anyway? Is >> there a reason not to allow the hours field to exceed 23? >> > > One reason is because it's what the standard demand. Another is > that it > isn't a proper time, just like feb 31 isn't a proper date. > > -- > /Dennis Björklund > > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that > your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: