Re: Index not being used in MAX function (7.2.3)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Index not being used in MAX function (7.2.3) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20177.1055352416@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Index not being used in MAX function (7.2.3) ("Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Index not being used in MAX function (7.2.3)
|
Список | pgsql-general |
"Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com> writes: > Is this a poorly designed hack: > Select max(expression) from <join> where <filter> Well, to start with, any nonempty WHERE probably invalidates the optimization, and I doubt it works if there's a join rather than a single table involved. But you're just handwaving --- the devil is in the details. How will you identify which aggregates are MIN and MAX (no, I don't like the idea of relying on the names; remember we have an extensible set of aggregates)? What will you do when there are multiple aggregates in the command --- or more generally, how complex a context for the aggregate call are you going to be able to support? Where exactly is this transformation going to occur in the planning pipeline, and how many cycles will we waste checking for the possible transform in cases where it doesn't apply? Questions like these are where we've gotten bogged down in the past. You might care to consult the pgsql-hackers archives for past discussions. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: