Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20171217155037.c4r264w6wdy3zw2v@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 5:18 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > > We have two options for marking valid: > > > > 1. after each ALTER INDEX ATTACH, verify whether the set of partitions > > that contain the index is complete; if so, mark it valid, otherwise do > > nothing. This sucks because we have to check that over and over for > > every index that we attach > > > > 2. We invent yet another command, say > > ALTER INDEX <idx-on-parent> VALIDATE > > If ALTER INDEX .. ATTACH is already taking AEL on the parent, then I > think it might as well try to validate while it's at it. But if not > then we might want to go with #2. The problem I have with it is that restoring a dump containing indexes on partitions becomes a O(N^2) deal as it has to do the full check once for every index we attach. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: