Re: libgeotiff (Re: PG10 postgis24 + gdal on RHEL6)
От | Justin Pryzby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: libgeotiff (Re: PG10 postgis24 + gdal on RHEL6) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20171214191502.GA5645@telsasoft.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: libgeotiff (Re: PG10 postgis24 + gdal on RHEL6) (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>) |
Список | pgsql-pkg-yum |
Just checking in. Our deployment scripts intending to use PG10 currently fail unless I install PGDG PG96 repo rpm. On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 01:33:13PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote: > I compared lists of RPMs available for PG10 vs PG96 for RHEL6 and found that > these seem to be missing for PG10. That primarily affects new installs, users > who upgrade from PG10 are likely to have the PG96 PGDG repo still. > > libgeotiff proj libpqxx? > > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 03:02:45PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:22:48AM +0000, Devrim Gündüz wrote: > > > On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 04:03 -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > > Just wanted to point out that the GDAL package seems to be unavailable for > > > > PG10 for (at least) centos6. > > > > > > Apologies for the inconvenience. I just pushed the packages to repo. They will > > > be available 1 hour later. > > > > It looks like maybe the same thing is true for libgeotiff.x86_64 ? > > ..which I see is available @pgdg94, and 96, but not 10. -- Justin Pryzby System Administrator Telsasoft +1-952-707-8581
В списке pgsql-pkg-yum по дате отправления: