Re: [HACKERS] SIGSEGV in BRIN autosummarize
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] SIGSEGV in BRIN autosummarize |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20171018165409.2cznyyugvqigtktt@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] SIGSEGV in BRIN autosummarize (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] SIGSEGV in BRIN autosummarize
Re: [HACKERS] SIGSEGV in BRIN autosummarize |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Justin Pryzby wrote: > No crashes in ~28hr. It occurs to me that it's a weaker test due to not > preserving most compilation options. And the previous code crashes in 45 minutes? That's solid enough for me; I'll clean up the patch and push in the next few days. I think what you have now should be sufficient for the time being for your production system. > If I understand, our crash isn't explained by the avw_database test > anyway (?) I don't see why you would think that -- I disagree. > Should I make clean and recompile with all non-prefix options and a minimal > patch (avw_database==MyDatabaseId || continue) ? > > Or recompile with existing options but no patch to first verify crash occurs > with locally compiled binary? I don't think either of these actions is necessary. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: