Re: [HACKERS] alter table doc fix

Amit Langote wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> Noticed that a alter table sub-command's name in Description (where it's
> OWNER) differs from that in synopsis (where it's OWNER TO).  Attached
> patch to make them match, if the difference is unintentional.

I agree -- pushed.

This paragraph
  <para>   The actions for identity columns (<literal>ADD   GENERATED</literal>, <literal>SET</literal> etc.,
<literal>DROP  IDENTITY</literal>), as well as the actions   <literal>TRIGGER</literal>, <literal>CLUSTER</literal>,
<literal>OWNER</literal>,  and <literal>TABLESPACE</literal> never recurse to descendant tables;   that is, they always
actas though <literal>ONLY</literal> were specified.   Adding a constraint recurses only for <literal>CHECK</literal>
constraints  that are not marked <literal>NO INHERIT</literal>.  </para>
 

is a bit annoying, though I think it'd be worse if we "fix" it to be
completely strict about the subcommands it refers to.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers