Re: [HACKERS] hash index on unlogged tables doesn't behave asexpected
От | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] hash index on unlogged tables doesn't behave asexpected |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170922.091635.62174270.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] hash index on unlogged tables doesn't behave as expected (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] hash index on unlogged tables doesn't behave as expected
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At Thu, 21 Sep 2017 16:19:27 -0400, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote in <694CB417-EF2C-4760-863B-AEC4530C21E3@gmail.com> > On Sep 21, 2017, at 8:59 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:. > > I think giving an error message like "hash indexes are not WAL-logged > > and .." for unlogged tables doesn't seem like a good behavior. > > +1. This seems like deliberate behavior, not a bug. Though I don't see it's bug and agree that the message is not proper, currently we can create hash indexes without no warning on unlogged tables and it causes a problem with replication. The point here is that if we leave the behavior (failure on the standby) for the reason that we see a warning on index creation, a similar messages ought to be for unlogged tables. Otherwise, our decision will be another option. (4) Though we won't not see a warning on hash index creation on unlogged tables, it seems to have been a problem and won'tmind. regards, -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: