Re: [HACKERS] COMMIT TRIGGERs, take n, implemented with CONSTRAINTTRIGGERS
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] COMMIT TRIGGERs, take n, implemented with CONSTRAINTTRIGGERS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170915182608.qi7bi3zwhuz3j4nv@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [HACKERS] COMMIT TRIGGERs, take n, implemented with CONSTRAINT TRIGGERS (Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] COMMIT TRIGGERs, take n, implemented with CONSTRAINTTRIGGERS
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2017-09-14 14:41:12 -0500, Nico Williams wrote: > I've read through several old threads on COMMIT TRIGGERs. Rather than > write a lengthy post addressing past debates, here's an implementation > and demonstration of [an approximation of] COMMIT TRIGGERs with natural > and _desirable_ semantics: I think you should also explain why that's a desirable set of semantics. E.g. explain the use case you have and potential other use-cases. I think it should also be explained that these are *pre*-commit triggers - IIRC some people have asked for *post*-commit triggers in the past. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: