Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
От | Ryan Murphy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170905044336.18925.22634.pgcf@coridan.postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application: make installcheck-world: tested, passed Implements feature: not tested Spec compliant: not tested Documentation: not tested This feature is obviously a pretty deep cut, and I don't understand the JOIN system enough to comment on whether the codeis correct. I did not see any issues when glancing through the patch. I ran "make check", "make installcheck" and "make installcheck-world" and had ALMOST no problems: I marked it Tested andPassed because the only issue I had was a recurring issue I've had with "make installcheck-world" which I think is unrelated: *** path/to/postgres/src/interfaces/ecpg/test/expected/connect-test5.stderr 2017-02-14 09:22:25.000000000 -0600 --- path/to/postgres/src/interfaces/ecpg/test/results/connect-test5.stderr 2017-09-04 23:31:50.000000000 -0500 *************** *** 36,42 **** [NO_PID]: sqlca: code: 0, state: 00000 [NO_PID]: ECPGconnect: opening database <DEFAULT> on <DEFAULT> port<DEFAULT> for user regress_ecpg_user2 [NO_PID]: sqlca: code: 0, state: 00000 ! [NO_PID]: ECPGconnect: could not open database: FATAL: database "regress_ecpg_user2" does not exist ... But this still Needs Review by someone who knows the JOIN system better. Best, Ryan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: