Re: [HACKERS] Re: ICU collation variant keywords and pg_collationentries (Was: [BUGS] Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE andwork_mem values)

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 09:22:07PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 8/14/17 12:23, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 8/13/17 15:39, Noah Misch wrote:
> >> This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update.  Kindly send
> >> a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
> >> update.  Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
> >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com
> > 
> > I think there are up to three separate issues in play:
> > 
> > - what to do about some preloaded collations disappearing between versions
> > 
> > - whether to preload keyword variants
> > 
> > - whether to canonicalize some things during CREATE COLLATION
> > 
> > I responded to all these subplots now, but the discussion is ongoing.  I
> > will set the next check-in to Thursday.
> 
> I haven't read anything since that has provided any more clarity about
> what needs changing here.  I will entertain concrete proposals about the
> specific points above (considering any other issues under discussion to
> be PG11 material), but in the absence of that, I don't plan any work on
> this right now.

I think you're contending that, as formulated, this is not a valid v10 open
item.  Are you?