Re: [HACKERS] segfault in HEAD when too many nested functions call
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] segfault in HEAD when too many nested functions call |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170728165613.ar2wgkn74drnpidv@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] segfault in HEAD when too many nested functions call (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] segfault in HEAD when too many nested functions call
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-07-28 09:29:58 -0700, Noah Misch wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 10:08:57PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > > For me that means the policy isn't quite right. It's not like I can > > force Tom to review the patch at a specific date. But the thread has > > been progressing steadily over the last days, so I'm not particularly > > concerned. > > Your colleagues achieve compliance despite uncertainty; for inspiration, I > recommend examining Alvaro's status updates as examples of this. The policy > currently governs your open items even if you disagree with it. That's just process over substance. Publishing repeated "I'll look at it again in $small_n days" doesn't really provide something useful. Anyway, I'll commit it after another pass in ~1 week if it doesn't get a review till then, but I assume it'll. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: