[HACKERS] Re: [bug fix] PG10: libpq doesn't connect to alternative hosts whensome errors occur
От | Noah Misch |
---|---|
Тема | [HACKERS] Re: [bug fix] PG10: libpq doesn't connect to alternative hosts whensome errors occur |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170728053049.GA2611952@rfd.leadboat.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [bug fix] PG10: libpq doesn't connect to alternativehosts when some errors occur (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
[HACKERS] Re: [bug fix] PG10: libpq doesn't connect to alternative hosts whensome errors occur
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:08:41AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki > <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org > >> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Peter Eisentraut > >> The problem is that if we decide to change the behavior mid-beta, then we'll > >> only have the rest of beta to find out whether people will like the other > >> behavior. > >> > >> I would aim for the behavior that is most suitable for refinement in the > >> future. The current behavior seems to match that. > > > > I think the pre-final release period is the very timing for refinement, in the perspective of users and PG developersas users. > > Sure that is the correct period to argue. We've reached that period. If anyone is going to push for a change here, now is the time. Absent such arguments, the behavior won't change.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: