Re: [BUGS] BUG #14738: ALTER SERVER for foregin servers not working
От | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14738: ALTER SERVER for foregin servers not working |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170713.134249.97825982.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14738: ALTER SERVER for foregin servers not working (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
At Tue, 11 Jul 2017 15:39:14 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote in <6234.1499801954@sss.pgh.pa.us> > Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes: > > Horiguchi-san, > > On 2017/07/11 10:28, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote: > >> I faintly recall such discussion was held aroud that time and > >> maybe we concluded that we don't do that but I haven't find such > >> a thread in pgsql-hackers.. > > > I mentioned it in my reply. Here again: > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160405.184408.166437663.horiguchi.kyotaro%40lab.ntt.co.jp > > The followup discussion noted that that approach was no good because it > would only close connections in the same session that had done the ALTER > SERVER. I think the basic idea of marking postgres_fdw connections as > needing to be remade when next possible is OK, but we have to drive it > off catcache invalidation events, the same as we did in c52d37c8b. An > advantage of that way is we don't need any new hooks in the core code. > > Kyotaro-san, are you planning to update your old patch? I'm pleased to do that. I will reconsider the way shown in a mail in the thread soon. regards, -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: