Re: [HACKERS] pg_stop_backup(wait_for_archive := true) on standbyserver
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] pg_stop_backup(wait_for_archive := true) on standbyserver |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170630185911.GX1769@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] pg_stop_backup(wait_for_archive := true) on standbyserver (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] pg_stop_backup(wait_for_archive := true) on standby server
Re: [HACKERS] pg_stop_backup(wait_for_archive := true) on standby server |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter, all, * Peter Eisentraut (peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > On 6/30/17 04:08, Masahiko Sawada wrote: > >> I'm not sure. I think this can be considered a bug in the implementation for > >> 10, and as such is "open for fixing". However, it's not a very critical bug > >> so I doubt it should be a release blocker, but if someone wants to work on a > >> fix I think we should commit it. > > > > I agree with you. I'd like to hear opinions from other hackers as well. > > It's preferable to make it work. If it's not easily possible, then we > should prohibit it. > > Comments from Stephen (original committer)? I agree that it'd be preferable to make it work, but I'm not sure I can commit to having it done in short order. I'm happy to work to prohibit it, but if someone has a few spare cycles to make it actually work, that'd be great. In short, I agree with Magnus and feel like I'm more-or-less in the same boat as he is (though slightly jealous as that's not actually physically the case, for I hear he has a rather nice boat...). Thanks! Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: