Re: [HACKERS] Broken hint bits (freeze)
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Broken hint bits (freeze) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170629012734.GB16576@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Broken hint bits (freeze) (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Broken hint bits (freeze)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 09:24:21AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > > I was not clear. I was not saying there can be only one extra WAL file. > > I am saying the "Latest checkpoint location" should be one WAL file > > farther on the master. I think the big problem is that we need a full > > replay of that WAL file, not just having it one less than the master. > > > > If the user has properly shutdown, then that last file should only > have checkpoint record, is it safe to proceed with upgrade without > actually copying that file? Yes, but how do we know they processed all the records in the second-to-last WAL file (in WAL shipping mode). -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: