Re: [HACKERS] transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken

On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 10:57:49PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 02:39:48PM +0100, Andrew Gierth wrote:
> > >>>>> "Noah" == Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes:
> > 
> >  Noah> This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update.
> >  Noah> Kindly send a status update within 24 hours,
> > 
> > oops, sorry! I forgot to include a date in the last one, and in fact a
> > personal matter delayed things anyway. I expect to have this wrapped up
> > by 23:59 BST on the 24th.
> 
> This PostgreSQL 10 open item is again past due for your status update.  Kindly
> send a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent
> status update.

IMMEDIATE ATTENTION REQUIRED.  This PostgreSQL 10 open item is long past due
for your status update.  Please reacquaint yourself with the policy on open
item ownership[1] and then reply immediately.  If I do not hear from you by
2017-06-28 06:00 UTC, I will transfer this item to release management team
ownership without further notice.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com