Re: [HACKERS] PG10 pgindent run
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] PG10 pgindent run |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170517010038.GA29892@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] PG10 pgindent run (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] PG10 pgindent run
Re: [HACKERS] PG10 pgindent run |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 08:39:36PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > > There we go: > > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=calliphoridae&dt=2017-05-16%2023:16:53&stg=typedefs > > Yup, looks good now. Thanks! > > BTW, comparing the typedef list to what I got a few hours ago, I see > that "Function" is now a known type name, along with the UWhatever > symbols from ICU. I wonder where that came from? A quick grep > suggests that it's not going to mess anything up too badly, but it > sure seems like a poor choice for a globally visible typedef name. OK, I assume we are good to go for Wednesday afternoon, UTC. Thanks for the research. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: