Re: [BUGS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170502150744.l6jr32attx2f6575@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 2017-05-02 10:53:19 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 4/24/17 15:52, Jason Petersen wrote: > > 1. Create a new sequence: CREATE SEQUENCE my_seq; > > 2. Start this loop twice in different shells: > > while true; do psql -1Xtc 'ALTER SEQUENCE my_seq RESTART 1'; done > > > Each loop should repeatedly succeed and simply print ALTER SEQUENCE over and over. > > > The output stream is punctuated by occasional "ERROR: tuple concurrently updated" messages. > > This message comes from the pg_sequence catalog update. But in the case > of the RESTART clause, you don't need to update the catalog, because it > just needs to write to the sequence's relation. So I have tweaked the > code a little to omit the catalog update if it's not needed. Your test > case works without errors now. Wait, how does this *actually* solve anything, but scratch at the surface? You just add a MAXVALUE and it starts failing (and not being adhered to) again? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: