Re: [HACKERS] [PostgreSQL 10] default of hot_standby should be "on"?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [PostgreSQL 10] default of hot_standby should be "on"? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170426112554.GH14000@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [PostgreSQL 10] default of hot_standby should be "on"? ("Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] [PostgreSQL 10] default of hot_standby should be "on"?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 07:33:27AM +0000, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote: > From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org > > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Masahiko Sawada > > The idea of changing the default value seems good to me but I'm not sure > > it's good idea to change the default value now under the circumstances where > > we're focus on stabilization. > > Also we should update the document as well. > > > > We can consider like this: the OP found a usability problem as a result of PG 10 development, so we will fix it as a stabilizationwork. We did work in Postgres 10 to make replication simpler with better defaults. This would be part of that improvement. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: