Re: [HACKERS] Unportable implementation of background worker start
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Unportable implementation of background worker start |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170424213807.kh5nfkfufqllp2wa@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Unportable implementation of background worker start (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Unportable implementation of background worker start
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-04-24 17:33:39 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > > On 2017-04-24 13:16:44 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > >> Unclear if related, but > >> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=gharial&dt=2017-04-24%2019%3A30%3A42 > >> has a suspicious timing of failing in a weird way. > > > Given that gharial is also failing on 9.6 (same set of commits) and > > coypu fails (again same set) on 9.6 > > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=coypu&dt=2017-04-24%2018%3A20%3A33 > > coypu's problem is unrelated: > > running bootstrap script ... 2017-04-24 23:04:53.084 CEST [21114] FATAL: could not create semaphores: No space left ondevice > 2017-04-24 23:04:53.084 CEST [21114] DETAIL: Failed system call was semget(1, 17, 03600). Note I was linking the 9.6 report form coypu, not HEAD. Afaics the 9.6 failure is the same as gharial's mode of failure. - Andres
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: