Re: [HACKERS] Statistics "dependency"
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Statistics "dependency" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170423140116.GA26652@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Statistics "dependency" (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Do we need multi-column frequency/histogram stats? WAS Re:[HACKERS] Statistics "dependency"
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 11:44:12AM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > For us "functional dependency" would sound like something to do with > functions (e.g. CREATE FUNCTION), so just "dependency" appears to me > to be the best term for this. > > There are multiple statistics for dependency stored, hence > "dependencies". I don't like it, but its the best term I can see at > present. OK, thank you for the reply, and I am sorry I forgot the previous discussion. I just wanted to re-check we had research this. Thanks. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: