Re: [HACKERS] Interval for launching the table sync worker
От | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Interval for launching the table sync worker |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170413.195504.89348773.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Interval for launching the table sync worker (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Interval for launching the table sync worker
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I confused sync and apply workers. sync worker failure at start causes immediate retries. At Thu, 13 Apr 2017 11:53:27 +0900, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote in <CAD21AoCR6eHgk0vaHShjO4Bre_VDKjHUbL9EuWHaUgRPSPPyVQ@mail.gmail.com> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:46 PM, Peter Eisentraut > <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On 4/12/17 00:48, Masahiko Sawada wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Peter Eisentraut > >>> Perhaps instead of a global last_start_time, we store a per relation > >>> last_start_time in SubscriptionRelState? > >> > >> I was thinking the same. But a problem is that the list of > >> SubscriptionRelState is refreshed whenever the syncing table state > >> becomes invalid (table_state_valid = false). I guess we need to > >> improve these logic including GetSubscriptionNotReadyRelations(). > > > > The table states are invalidated on a syscache callback from > > pg_subscription_rel, which happens roughly speaking when a table > > finishes the initial sync. So if we're worried about failing tablesync > > workers relaunching to quickly, this would only be a problem if a > > tablesync of another table finishes right in that restart window. That > > doesn't seem a terrible issue to me. > > > > I think the table states are invalidated whenever the table sync > worker starts, because the table sync worker updates its status of > pg_subscription_rel and commits it before starting actual copy. So we > cannot rely on that. I thought we can store last_start_time into > pg_subscription_rel but it might be overkill. I'm now thinking to > change GetSubscriptionNotReadyRealtions so that last_start_time in > SubscriptionRelState is taken over to new list. This resolves the problem but, if I understand correctly, the many pallocs in process_syncing_tables_for_apply() is working on ApplyContext and the context is reset before the next visit here (in LogicalRepApplyLoop). Although this is not a problem of this patch, this is a problem generally. regards, -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: