Re: [DOCS] Window function docs
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [DOCS] Window function docs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170410191558.GD9801@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [DOCS] Window function docs (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [DOCS] Window function docs
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 01:06:53PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > This change is not on my patch yes but what do you think about changing > > "regular" and "normal" aggregate designations to "generic"? That seems > > clearer because the aggregates work in non-window and window contexts. > > I don't think "generic" is le mot juste here. What's more generic about > avg() than about mode(), for instance? > > My dictionary says "generic" means "characteristic of a class or group > of things", which doesn't seem to have anything to do with this. > > I actually think "regular" might be a better choice than "normal" for this > purpose, mainly because somebody looking for statistical aggregates might > think that "normal" has something to do with normal distributions. So > maybe we should leave that one group of uses alone and s/normal/regular/ > in section 9.20. But in any case it would help to define the term > explicitly in both sections. I don't think adding another defined term in this dense text is going to help so I just specified "general-purpose and statistical aggregates" where needed; patch attached. I didn't touch any mention of "normal" in reference to pg_aggregate.aggfnoid where normal/"n" has a specific meaning. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
Вложения
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: