Re: [HACKERS] Remaining 2017-03 CF entries
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Remaining 2017-03 CF entries |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170407192803.wz4sj5zge5swi2ih@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Remaining 2017-03 CF entries (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Remaining 2017-03 CF entries
Re: [HACKERS] Remaining 2017-03 CF entries |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > > Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM) > > - fair number of people don't think it's ready for v10. Given the number of votes against putting this on pg10, I am going to back off from this patch now, with an eye towards putting it in pg11 as soon as the tree opens. Either I or Pavan are going to post another version of this patch series, within the next couple of weeks, so that others can base their testing, review and suggestions. > > - can't move to next fest because it's waiting-on-author, which doesn't > > allow that. Doesn't strike me as a useful restriction. > > I agree that that CF app restriction makes little sense. What the restriction means is that if a patch is in waiting-on-author, the proper "close" action is to return-with-feedback. There is no point in moving the patch to the next commitfest if there is no further patch version. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: