Re: [PATCH] Reduce src/test/recovery verbosity
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Reduce src/test/recovery verbosity |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170330125236.GT9812@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Reduce src/test/recovery verbosity (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Reduce src/test/recovery verbosity
Re: [PATCH] Reduce src/test/recovery verbosity Re: [PATCH] Reduce src/test/recovery verbosity |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael, * Michael Paquier (michael.paquier@gmail.com) wrote: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:08 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: > >> > If there's a way to change the verbosity for just those scripts, I'd be > >> > happy to do that, if we're unable to agree on reducing it across the > >> > board.. > >> > >> I'd rather silence only scripts that are overly verbose. > > > > I'm fine with that, but how? > > The important point to me is not to show the tests that passed, it is > to show the tests that are failing when running them. So I would > suggest to just remove the --verbose flag in PROVE_FLAGS. If you do > so, the test of pg_dump would show up like that, printing as well a > count number while running: Right, but you can't do that for just pg_dump. I'd be fine with removing --verbose globally, as your patch does, but there was some argument that we then would have long 'quiet' periods. I haven't had a chance to go test if that's really the case yet though. Thanks! Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: