Re: Schedule and Release Management Team for PG10
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Schedule and Release Management Team for PG10 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170329190450.kjfik7wykvclkhdf@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Schedule and Release Management Team for PG10 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > My own thought is that there's room for at least a few days' slop in > the end date of the final commitfest, depending on what patches remain > open and what the prospects are for getting them done. (In the past > we've sometimes let the final fest stretch on indefinitely, which is > clearly the Wrong Thing; but that doesn't mean that the Right Thing is > to say that it ends at 2017-04-01 00:00 UTC no matter what.) The RMT > should look at things in another day or two and make a judgment call > about that. I was rather surprised to see the March commitfest declared to exactly one month and feature freeze immediately thereafter. Last time around we left 2 weeks between CF end and feature freeze; the previous one I think we had the final CF last two months. Not stretch on indefinitely, but we know the final CF for a cycle takes more effort than previous ones, so it seems reasonable to give more time. We have a large number of patches still waiting for review. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: