Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170321142114.dh674kyr4lx26hof@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM) (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > Sure, we can try that. I think we need to try it with > > synchronous_commit = off, otherwise, WAL writes completely overshadows > > everything. > > synchronous_commit = off is a much more realistic scenario than fsync = off. Sure, synchronous_commit=off is a reasonable case. But I say if we lose a few % on the case where you update only the first indexed of a large number of very wide columns all indexed, and this is only noticeable if you don't write WAL and only if you update all the rows in the table, then I don't see much reason for concern. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: