[HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve pg_dump regression tests and codecoverage
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve pg_dump regression tests and codecoverage |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170320143515.GM9812@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve pg_dump regression tests and code coverage (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve pg_dump regressiontests and code coverage
Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve pg_dump regression tests and code coverage |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert, * Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote: > I'm glad that you are working on fixing > pg_dump bugs and improving test coverage, but my gladness about that > does not extend to thinking that the processes which other people > follow for their work should be waived for yours. Sorry. To be clear, I am not asking for any kind of special exception for myself. I continue to be of the opinion that this entire discussion is quite flipped from how we really should be running things- adding regression tests to improve code coverage, particularly when they're simply adding to the existing structure for those tests, should be strongly encouraged both before and after feature-freeze. Thanks. Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: