Re: [HACKERS] Allow pg_dumpall to work without pg_authid
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Allow pg_dumpall to work without pg_authid |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170315135619.GR9812@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Allow pg_dumpall to work without pg_authid (Sachin Kotwal <kotsachin@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Allow pg_dumpall to work without pg_authid
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Greetings, * Sachin Kotwal (kotsachin@gmail.com) wrote: > Thanks. I understand this is small but new feature and not bug fix. > But we should be able to backpatch if there is no dependency. No, it's a new feature and won't be back-patched. > It will help users to get benefit of this feature for g96 and pg95 in RDS > until they will have pg10 in RDS. There is no need to wait for pg10 to be in RDS to use PG10's pg_dumpall against RDS databases. pg_dump and pg_dumpall are very intentionally designed and intended to work against older versions of PG, so as soon as PG10 is released you'll be able to run PG10's pg_dumpall against your 9.6 or 9.5 RDS databases. > If It is against community policy then it is ok. I can understand. It is against community policy to back-patch features. Thanks! Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: