Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Enabling atomics on ARM64
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Enabling atomics on ARM64 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170311021717.gghlnzdupmwbjh2y@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Enabling atomics on ARM64 (Roman Shaposhnik <rvs@apache.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-03-10 18:14:13 -0800, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 2017-03-08 19:18:04 -0800, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > >> I'd like to offer a forward port from a change I'm contributing > >> the Greenplum code base over here > > > > I think the change makes sense. Any chance we could convince you to > > bring up an arm64 buildfarm animal (our test infrastructure) up, so we > > can be sure arm64 stays working? See https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/ > > What does it take to be a your build farm slave? Can it be done via > a Docker container that calls out to your infrastructure? I can probably > run that as part of the Apache Bigtop CI. Yes, it can. The buildfarm stuff is all push from the test machine's side, not pull. You basically configure a cron job as described in https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_Buildfarm_Howto and then register your animal with the form on https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/register-form.pl Would be great. We have a bunch of 32bit arm animal, but no 64bit ones: https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_members.pl https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_status.pl Regards, Andres
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: