Re: [HACKERS] contrib modules and relkind check
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] contrib modules and relkind check |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170309132538.GC9812@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] contrib modules and relkind check (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Amit, Michael, * Amit Langote (Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp) wrote: > On 2017/03/09 11:51, Michael Paquier wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Amit Langote > > <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > >> On 2017/03/08 16:47, Michael Paquier wrote: > >>> Only regular tables are tested as valid objects. Testing toast tables > >>> is not worth the complication. Could you add as well a matview? > >> > >> Done in the attached updated patch. > > > > +select count(*) > 0 from pg_visibility('matview'); > > + ?column? > > +---------- > > + f > > +(1 row) > > That's quite a generic name :) You may want to use less common names > > in your tests. > > I agree. Updated patch attached. > > > OK, I am marking that as ready for committer. I'm starting to look over this, seems pretty straight-forward. Barring issues, I should get it committed in probably an hour or two. Thanks! Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: